Firstly, to the point of this topic, I believe that the Dr is uncircumcised since when he was “reborn” in his current form it regenerated as the “ideal”, unaltered human male body. By this I mean that he grew the foreskin that is characteristic to the male body in addition to being the ultimate physical specimen.

Secondly, as to the practice of circumcision. Sorry to hear it Jackal, but I expect you are a rare case, given that we naturally HAVE a foreskin it is unlikely that it gets as bad as your in mot cases otherwise evolution would have eliminated it OR circumcision would be recognized as necessary MEDICAL procedure and be performed on all newborns.

I guess, since you’re probably not a guy, you don’t realize how much significance that skin on our penises is
in the sense that having it (in America) often times causes ridicule.

For what reason? Exactly. It’s stupid to think that a few extra millimeters on the skin of someone’s penis would cause another to look down on you.

The debate is only secondary.
A way to vent and let out our anger at the stupidity of the idea to cut off part of your penis, call it normal, and then turn around and reject those who choose not to inflict unnecessary pain on their children.